Wednesday 3 July 2013

Cradle to Cradle (2008)



Re-making the way we make things is the order of the day.  A short history of manufacturing will teach you that if you don’t evolve your manufacturing and design processes you will get left behind.  In its day, the Model T Ford was a revolution in automotive manufacturing, but the process would obviously be viewed as horribly inefficient by today's standards.  Consequently, it’s never a bad time to rethink how we design and manufacture mass goods – especially given the extent to which these goods pollute our atmosphere and then pack our landfills.

Authors Michael Braungart and William McDonough take this relatively obvious truism and deliver a relatively short, but potentially revolutionary book about taking the next step in evolving beyond cradle to grave manufacturing and design.  Braungart and McDonaugh are architects by trade and with this in mind it is not surprising that they have chosen to view the issue of environmental sustainability in a holistic nature: from start to finish, via the products and services of the world. 

The title, Cradle to Cradle, encapsulates the central tenet of this book: that we must stop thinking of products, processes, buildings and resources as having expiration dates.  Rather, the authors work backwards from the logical assertion that the world has finite resources and that we cannot afford to treat resources as expendable and space as incalculably vast.  Instead, they advocate viewing the purchase or use of any and every resource as essentially a lease.  This is the first point to commend in this book; realising that it is impossible to truly own a resource, will inevitably lead to a greater duty of care and increased utility when in possession of that resource.

Braungart and McDonough are down-to earth architects with impressive careers.   With clientèle ranging from commercial giants, Nike and Ford, to niche organisations, such as the Environmental Defence Fund.  Cradle to Cradle’s authors propel the book with their credibility and expertise.  The book doesn’t brim over with personality, but what they lack in style they make up for in substance.

The book briskly covers the evolution of manufacturing trends and the history of commercial resource use, leading into a sound critique of modern methods.  Chief among the culprits of unsustainable modern practice are the ideas that:

  •  Efficiency is King: less of something bad does not necessarily make it good if the process or material you are using in the first place is not appropriate.
  •  Activity equals prosperity: this is exemplified in the book by the saying, “if brute force doesn't work, you’re not using enough,” which the authors argue is an all too common approach in manufacturing at present.  Heat, beat and treat are words that are far too common on the engineer’s tongue in the 21st century.
  •  And “one-size-fits all”  design solutions: the most memorable, though perhaps not the most easily transposed example, being that detergent is usually manufactured in the same way and in the same concentrations for all markets across the world despite the hardness of a community’s water being a decisive factor in the effectiveness of a detergent.   

The most interesting and ecologically sound part of the Cradle to Cradle (C2C) philosophy is the idea that “waste equals food.”  That is, when we are finished with a commercial product, whether its components are biological (able to biodegrade) or technological (metallic or synthetic), it should have been designed with its end-use in mind.  Mindlessly, many products are inadvertently designed to be what they refer to as “monstrous hybrids,” combining biological and technological components so that neither component can be extracted and reused at the end of its life-cycle.   Instead, C2C provides a multitude of good design rules that can ensure products do not become obsolescent after their original incarnation.

But what propels C2C philosophy is the concept of eco-effectiveness, which is the idea that once a system is designed with an effective “closed loop system” we find that, not only do we have almost zero waste, but also net outputs that are advantageous to the surrounding environment.  To achieve this design, the three principles must be considered and carefully balanced:
  1.    Ecology,
  2.    Equity, and
  3.    Economy.

And the proof is in the pudding, with the authors providing evidence of car and textile factories they have worked on that have been transformed from wasteful, polluting and harmful places into factories who work harmoniously with their surroundings.  In order to do so, the entire system is redesigned to ensure that products and by-products nourish the surrounding ecosystem as they are made with biodegradable material.  Alternatively, if biodegradable material cannot be used then the technical materials must re-enter the work flow instead of being dumped, burned or buried.  This has the consequence of creating car factories that are net producers of energy and textile factories that use dirty water in their processes and then amazingly output clean water.  Such design requires expertise, investment, long-term planning and commitment, but when the result is such a prosperous, fertile and profitable system, the decision should become inevitable.

I really enjoyed this book because of it accessibility and common-sense approach.  Before reading Cradle to Cradle, I viewed recycling as an important, but not particularly interesting, part of the environmental agenda.  However, Braungart and McDonaugh have shown that when we think holistically and begin to consider the entire life cycle of services and goods (particularly buildings), not only can we design more aesthetically and environmentally friendly things, but we generally create unanticipated economic advantages and eco-system services as well.

I hope by now that readers are noting this recurring theme in my reviews: that becoming environmentally sustainable leads to long-term economic profitability (please see Natural Capitalism as a prime example).  Businesses and regulators alike should stand up and take notice.


Score: 70/100

No comments:

Post a Comment